Leeds United won’t want to write off a £15m investment lightly, but football often forces difficult decisions. Sometimes, a signing arrives with plenty of promise but slips down the pecking order, with fewer chances to prove his worth and little sign that things will change.
Daniel Farke may have to address that when the January transfer window opens. Leeds need to ensure their squad is equipped for the second half of the season, which means being honest about which players still have a meaningful role.
There is a case for giving this player another chance, but patience has its limits. If his minutes remain limited, a departure could become the best outcome for everyone involved.
Read More: Transfer insider reveals the one condition that would force Leeds to sell £15m star
Sean Longstaff is running out of time at Leeds
Longstaff arrived at Elland Road in 2025 and initially became an important part of Farke’s plans. However, an injury disrupted his first season, and he never fully returned to the starting eleven in the second half of the campaign.
His situation has deteriorated further this season. The midfielder has made just three Premier League appearances, all from the bench, leaving him with little opportunity to build momentum or make a serious case for regular selection.
For a player with Premier League experience, that is hardly ideal. At 28, Longstaff will want to play regularly rather than spend most of a season watching from the sidelines. If he cannot see a route back into Farke’s plans, he may start looking elsewhere.
Read More: £15m Leeds star has three months to save his Elland Road career
Leeds should consider a January sale, but only with a replacement lined up
There is a strong argument for Leeds to let Longstaff leave if a suitable offer arrives. The midfielder needs football, while the club could use the opportunity to bring in someone better suited to the role Farke wants filled.
That does not mean Leeds should simply cut their losses. Longstaff has shown he can contribute at this level, and selling him without securing a replacement would risk leaving the squad short during a demanding part of the season.
The sensible approach is to explore the market while identifying potential alternatives. If Leeds can find a midfielder who offers more of what Farke needs, a January departure would make sense for all concerned.
Longstaff may yet force his way back into contention, but his lack of involvement makes that increasingly difficult to envisage. He joined Leeds to play a significant role, not to become a peripheral figure.
Unless his situation changes over the coming weeks, both player and club may have to accept that moving on is the most practical solution. A £15m signing deserves a fair assessment, but Leeds cannot let sentiment dictate their recruitment plans.
Maybe it is time to wield the axe on The Leeds Press. Whatever Sean Longstaff has to offer as a back up to the midfield his minimal opportunities do not reflect his capabilities. To get the best from any player a run of games may produce an accurate measure of this experienced player’s current worth to the team.
Why do the Leeds Press continually write bullshit articles? We know it is just to create advertising space but at least make the articles interesting rather than write total crap about any player who hasn’t played for a while. I could understand it more if this was called the Man Utd press but seriously? The drivel being produced in these pages recently is appalling.
He is a back up player to the starting 11. What do you expect? I wouldn’t be surprised if Leeds went in for Willock in January actually and reunited the two. He has only a few months left on his contract. That would give Leeds Ampudu & Stach, and Willock & Longstaff as options for the middle of the park, in front of a pretty solid backline. Just the 10’s to upgrade and cover for DCL and you have a very decent PL side we can continue to build upon.